The True Cost of Government Relations Consulting
A candid analysis of what you're really paying for—and whether it's worth it
Hiring a government relations consultant for 50,000 RMB per month, the actual time you get to meet with decision-makers averages out to less than 200 RMB per hour. Where does the rest of the money go?
Many business owners don't do the math this way. The older generation of entrepreneurs thought government relations was all about wining and dining, spending a few thousand to get things done. Today's business people think they just need to find someone "with connections" and pay them a consulting fee.
Here's the reality. The government relations consulting firms I know charge monthly fees ranging from 30,000 to 150,000 RMB. How much actual "contact time" you get—most people have never calculated it.
I once did my own calculation. A certain company charged 80,000 RMB per month and arranged two formal meetings per quarter, each lasting about 45 minutes. That's 240,000 RMB for three months, with actual contact time of 90 minutes. The cost per minute of contact: 2,666 RMB.
This number made me rethink the entire industry.
When Government Relations Isn't Worth the Price
I believe government relations consulting has value. I also believe there's a cost-effectiveness threshold: when the cost per minute of access exceeds the cost of directly participating in industry association activities, the service loses its meaning.
Industry association annual fees—the ones I'm part of—range from 5,000 to 30,000 RMB. You can attend at least four or five government-related events per year, each with opportunities to interact with relevant department officials. Calculate it out, and the cost per minute of access might be just a few dozen RMB.
Lawyers
Lawyers provide professional legal opinions—something you can use directly, with certain output. They charge 3,000 RMB per hour.
GR Consultants
Government relations consultants provide "access opportunities"—possibilities, not certainties. These are two completely different things.
Many government relations practitioners like to compare their services to lawyer fees. They say lawyers charge 3,000 per hour, so what we charge is cheap. This comparison is problematic. Lawyers provide professional legal opinions—something you can use directly, with certain output. Government relations consultants provide "access opportunities"—possibilities, not certainties. These are two completely different things.
A more reasonable comparison would be headhunting services. Headhunters charge on success; government relations consulting charges monthly. Headhunters don't charge if they can't find the right person; government relations consultants charge whether or not they can arrange meetings.
Real Case Warning
I've seen consultants charging 100,000 RMB monthly who couldn't arrange a single effective meeting in six months. There were no performance clauses in the contract. They kept charging anyway.
Industry Tricks of the Trade
I've noticed a trend in recent years. Government relations consulting firms used to sell "relationship resources." Now many have started selling "policy research services."
On the surface, services appear more comprehensive. But the marginal cost of policy research is very low—that's the key. A policy analysis report can be sold to ten clients just by changing the industry name. It's copy and paste.
The Pricing Shift
Three years ago, a company's basic service package was 50,000 RMB monthly, including policy tracking and two meeting arrangements. Now at the same price, meeting arrangements became "as circumstances allow," and policy tracking became the main service.
Effective Price Increase
Meeting arrangements now cost extra, or they've been moved to higher-tier service packages. The price hasn't changed, but you get less.
Quarterly Contracts
Contracts used to be annual. Now many companies push quarterly contracts, claiming "flexibility." But quarterly contract unit prices are 15% to 20% higher than annual contracts.
The Coffee Bean Effect
Most clients won't just sign for one quarter. By the end of the year, they pay 15% to 20% more. It's the same logic as coffee beans going from 16-ounce to 12-ounce packaging*.
"The marginal cost of policy research is very low—that's the key. A policy analysis report can be sold to ten clients just by changing the industry name."
What Your Money Actually Buys
Government relations consulting firms will say: our value isn't just meeting arrangements—it's also information channels, risk alerts, and strategic advice.
These have value, I won't deny that. My own experience is that truly valuable warning information often doesn't come from consultants. It spreads faster in industry WeChat groups.
Sources of Useful Policy Information
Based on my company's data from last year
I did a statistical analysis. Of the useful policy information my company received last year, 70% came from industry groups and associations, 20% from public channels, and 10% from paid consultants. That 10% cost 360,000 RMB per year.
Every company's situation is different. Some industries genuinely need professional government relations services—licensing-based industries, heavily regulated industries, that's a different story. Most small and medium enterprises can solve 80% of their needs by joining two or three industry associations for 30,000 to 50,000 RMB. The remaining 20% might indeed require more investment—that's another matter.
Government relations services costing over 100,000 RMB per month are hard to justify as worthwhile investments for companies with annual revenue under 50 million RMB. It's not that the service itself lacks value—it's that the cost-effectiveness doesn't match.
Some companies like to point to "project implementation" and "policy subsidies." They say they helped you get a certain amount in subsidies, so the consulting fee was worth it. There's a lot of padding in these claims. Many subsidies are available to anyone who meets the requirements—just follow the normal application process, no special channels needed. Taking credit for things you could have gotten anyway—I've seen too much of that.
Back to the Numbers
The contracting method change I mentioned earlier deserves more explanation. Quarterly contracts look like a lower barrier—30,000/month becomes "try 3 months for 90,000 first." 90,000 is certainly easier to accept than 360,000. The problem is you can't accomplish anything in 3 months. Government relations is slow work; three months is barely enough to become familiar faces. After trying for 3 months with no results, companies have two choices: either cut their losses or keep signing. Most will keep signing because they've already spent the money. By year's end, they've paid 15% to 20% more than if they'd signed an annual contract directly.
The Bottom Line
My view is that the real value of the government relations industry lies in helping companies reduce uncertainty and obtain decision-making information. These things are worth money.
The current pricing logic in this industry has problems. Monthly fees, no connection to results, using policy research to pad service content, moving basic services into premium packages. These practices make the industry's trust costs higher and higher, leaving many companies spending money without getting what they wanted.
I'm not saying all practitioners do this. There are still people with professional competence and ethical standards. As a buyer, you need to do the math clearly. Don't get carried away by words like "circles," "resources," and "connections." Calculate your cost per minute of access. Calculate what services you actually need. Then decide how much to spend. Don't compare government relations services to lawyer fees—compare them to industry association costs.
-
Calculate your cost per minute of access before committing to any government relations service
-
Compare costs with industry associations, not with lawyer fees
-
Be wary of quarterly contracts that seem more flexible but cost more annually
-
Recognize that most valuable policy information often comes from industry groups, not paid consultants